- Sheriff John Whetsel backed by employees and officials, announced that the County Jail is now Accredited, at a news conference, 9-11-12. mh
Editors Note: This is the fourth installment of an ongoing series about Oklahoma County Jail, its development and history, ongoing structural issues and possible remedies. Visit okgazette.com for ongoing coverage, supporting documentation and more.
Most area residents probably werent surprised when, in the last week of August, the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerces leader said a public vote to approve a sales tax vote to raise funds to build a new jail wouldnt pass.
But dont be fooled; this issue isnt going anywhere.
Oklahoma County still faces a potential threat. Its lockup could be closed by the federal government due to health and safety issues faced by its inmates.
That threat comes from the U.S. Department of Justice, which reviewed the jails configuration and operations beginning in 2003 after numerous complaints from inmates and their attorneys and dozens of deaths.
The investigation ended in 2009 when the county and federal government signed a memorandum of understanding, which formalized what the county promised to do regarding improving conditions for inmates and security staff.
The agreement, valid five years before it expired in 2014, required the county to make changes to how the center was operated and how its inmates were handled.
Its important to note that Oklahoma County Sheriff John Whetsel and his security team with over 500 members addressed nearly every issue raised by investigators.
But he said a handful of issues lack of appropriate holding space, natural lighting, recreational areas and staffing require additional funding to remedy, which would likely require an additional sales tax vote.
Whetsel said that also means a new structure must be built.
- Mark Hancock / File
- A 2009 Memorandum of Understanding between the county and the U.S. Department of Justice decreed the jail would hire and train more security staff and improve its camera monitoring system.
According to a U.S. Department of Justice letter sent to Oklahoma County dated July 31, 2008, inspectors from the agency toured the jail numerous times in 2003 and again in 2007.
It concluded that the county jail failed to provide inmates with reasonable protections from harm; constitutionally required mental health services; adequate housing, sanitation and environmental protections; and serious fire safety risks.
Several factors impacted safety concerns for inmates and staff. First, during the 2007 inspection, the facility was holding about 2,500 people, nearly double its rated capacity. Inspectors found as many as four inmates in cells designed for two, with many sleeping on floors. Investigators also noted that overcrowding conditions made it difficult for staff to adequately segregate more serious offenders from the rest of the population, nor could it send problem inmates to disciplinary cells because not enough existed.
They also determined the lockup did not have enough detention officers to adequately supervise inmates, and officers were often required to perform duties that pulled them away from their primary responsibilities.
While the jail installed a security camera system to help monitor pods on each floor, investigators noted that blind spots hindered its effectiveness and inmates often covered cell lights and windows with towels and other items. These issues, they determined, resulted in an inordinately high risk of inmate-on-inmate violence, noting that there were 70 such incidents, which resulted in two deaths and numerous serious injuries.
Understaffing also meant personnel was more prone to use forced restraint, which also concerned the Department of Justice, and violence within the lockup was not investigated thoroughly.
Inmates were not adequately screened for potential health problems as they were admitted, and inspectors found similar deficiencies regarding the centers response to medical emergencies. Mental health needs also were not being met.
They determined the jails physical plant was not adequately maintained, along with other concerns involving food preparation, pest control and laundry services.
Memorandum of Understanding
An agreement Oklahoma County signed with the Justice Department in 2009 gave it five years to remedy the problems. Among other things, it also required the Oklahoma County Sheriffs Office to study how many detention officers it needed and then get them hired trained and working.
It required closer monitoring of inmates, classifying them and getting them into appropriate areas, better management of discipline programs and to better investigate acts of violence. It also called for improved inmate screening, treatment and care access. In addition, it required better overall facility maintenance.
In 2010, Whetsel reported the sheriffs office addressed nearly all improvements called for by the memorandum, including cleanliness; food service; inmate monitoring, medical care, classification and housing; lighting; and staffing.
In doing that, Whetsel said his agency spent nearly $1 million to: >> add new high-definition cameras, monitors and equipment >> contract with an outside food service vendor >> paint cells and receiving areas >> replace floors and showers in pods >> remodel areas on several floors >> add medical equipment >> replace electric locks on the jails fire stairwell doors >> make other improvements.
Whetsel also added Jack Herron as the facilitys new administrator, who had 20 years of experience working for the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
However, in 2014, four issues lack of appropriate holding space, natural lighting, recreational areas and staffing remained unaddressed.
At that point, Oklahoma County organized another study committee to evaluate the feasibility of calling an election to approve a tax to fund the development of a new facility to address those concerns.
That study, however, opened the door for politics to enter once again. After looking at the issue for about a year, proponents of the new jail plan realized its not ready for a vote.
The politics of the issue are very difficult, said Ray Vaughn, an Oklahoma County Commissioner who asked for the latest study. Basically, what we are proposing is going to require new financing, which we dont have. Our two options are a sales tax, which I like, and an ad valorem tax, which I dont.
Vaughn said Oklahoma County is the only county in the state that doesnt have an existing sales tax to address these needs, but he also said that argument doesnt hold much sway with the public.
People dont like new taxes, and they especially dont like new taxes for correctional spaces. And, lets face it, they dont care about inmates, he said. But we dont have that luxury. Under federal law, we must care about inmates, and if we dont, then they will be in here to make sure we are treating everyone adequately.
Print headline: Improvement plans, A sweeping agreement in 2009 determined the jail lacked proper staffing, space, security, health care and more.